Category Archive: Burnelli Building

Warwick and Burnelli Residents – please join me in demanding electricity refunds from Rendall and Rittner

I am suggesting that all Warwick residents should contact the estate manager (estatemanager@chelseabridgewharf.com) directly and ask politely, but firmly,  that we get a refund or adjustment of service charge amount because the electricity is now costing under 30p per KW/H when the figure in  the budget was much much higher (46p for W1-3 and 71p for W4 as I mentioned above).  Please ask your friends/neighbours at CBW to do the same. A similar situation exists in relation to Burnelli.

Please join online meetings on how to get Right to Manage at Chelsea Bridge Wharf – November 30th 7-8pm and December 1st 1-2pm

Dear CBW residents
Are you tired of paying huge service charge increases?
Do you want a better level of estate upkeep and service?

Please join one of our online meetings — find out how we can get Right to Manage, choose our own managing agent and take back control of our development. The meetings feature a short presentation by Canonbury Estate Management
followed by a Question and Answer session

All residents welcome! Contact residents@chelseabridgewharf.org.uk if any questions

November 30th 7-8pm
Zoom link https://qrco.de/bdWj64
You should not need a passcode but if asked please enter TrK6yG

December 1st 1-2pm
Zoom link https://qrco.de/bdWjbi

Chelsea Bridge Wharf Residents’ Newsletter – Summer 2022

The Chelsea Bridge Wharf Residents’ Association (CBWRA) have claimed RTM is not achievable at CBW – experts say otherwise! Independent expert advice obtained by residents in June 2022 shows that CBW can achieve Right to Manage (https://tinyurl.com/28dht6ya) and therefore it appears CBWRA has misinformed residents in stating that Right to Manage is not possible at CBW.

Chelsea Bridge Wharf Residents’ Survey 2021

The initial report from the above survey is now available here OVERVIEW FINDINGS CBW as a place to live A large majority of respondents (80.1%) agree /strongly agree that ‘CBW is a good… Continue reading

Residents’ Satisfaction Survey: more dishonesty, excuses and obfuscation from Rendall and Rittner

More than a  year on from the closure of the residents’ satisfaction survey and residents have still not been given the results by Rendall and Rittner. At a residents’ meeting on 25th September… Continue reading

Bad News for Residents – Council Planning Department to recommend acceptance of revised Berkeley Homes application for use of Sopwith Way arches

A letter posted on the Wandsworth Borough Council planning website https://planning.wandsworth.gov.uk/WAM/showCaseFile.do?appType=planning&appNumber=2016/7213 states that planning officers will recommend to the planning committee that Berkeley Homes be allowed to use two of the arches in… Continue reading

Berkeley Homes forced to abandon SECOND planning application for use of depots

Berkeley Homes have withdrawn their second planning application to use the Sopwith Way depots for storage for the VISTA project. The disgusting, arrogant behaviour of Mr Travis Crawford of Berkeley Homes  has been slapped… Continue reading

Rendall & Rittner contractor doing 50mph in 5mph zone

Rendall & Rittner refuse to enforce the speed limit on this road which they are responsible for managing. Karen Ann Gray of Rendall & Rittner tells me that she is satisfied with existing… Continue reading

Crazy driving in 5mph zone – Battersea Power Station Development Company bus (operated by GUTSI ‘executive transfer’)

Battersea Power Station Development Company bus (supplied by GUTSI ‘executive transfer) and van in interesting manoeuvre on 5 mph road. Berkeley Homes opened up this quiet service road without consultation with residents, but… Continue reading

Berkeley Homes new planning application for Sopwith Way depots – my objections

https://planning.wandsworth.gov.uk/WAM/showCaseFile.do?appType=planning&appNumber=2016/7213 I object in the strongest possible terms to this planning application by Berkeley Homes. I have a number of valid grounds on which to base my objection, which I believe will be… Continue reading