The New Era of Transparency at Chelsea Bridge Wharf

The questions that Urang and the Chelsea Bridge Wharf RTM company refuse to answer..

So much for Urang’s ‘new era of transparency’ 🙂

• Why have the elections for directors or the RTM company been postponed till September?
• What is the protocol for the election of RTM directors?
• Why did a director of the RTM company (Larisa Villar Hauser) resign a few weeks ago?
• How can there be fair elections when some leaseholders are ‘banned’ from the CBW app for calling out the misinformation of the RTM directors ?
• Where are the notes from the RTM company’s weekly meeting with Urang which they claim they are having?
• When there will be a survey of residents as promised?
• How can Urang claim to know what residents’ priorities are, without consultation? Urang are claiming that it is not a leaseholder priority to reduce service charges but in fact it is a top priority for many as was clear from the meeting of residents with Urang on June the 9th where 74% stated that service charge levels were a priority
• Why has Urang apparently embarked on a major programme of renovation – without any costings or consultation?
• What is the cost of the drone photography/video project which Urang and the RTM company have decided to carry out? Should such PR stunts really be a priority? Why have residents not been consulted about this?
• Why can’t leaseholders see the contract with Urang
• When there will be an Annual General Meeting (AGM) of the RTM company?
• When will the next meeting with Urang and leaseholders will be?
• What is Urang’s assessment of the handover from Rendall and Rittner? Is everything on order? Are there funds or key document missing or nay key issues which are unclear?
• Are the RTM company assessing, as they promised, to examine what action can be taken against Rendall and Rittner for inappropriate charging (i.e. a service charge audit).
• What is the cost of the Right to Manage process and will any of this be billed to the service charge